Why are we poor? Why is it that, inspite of our teeming natural resources, of our warm and intelligent and English-speaking people, of our strategic geographical location, and of our much vaunted democracy, we continue to be poor? How come we continue to be the “basket case of Asia” and a country of laggards? Why? We are poor because Catholicism is the predominant ideology in our country today. Catholicism is the single biggest cause of our underdevelopment because it is an ideology that imprisons the Filipino in a mindset that impedes, rather than promotes, development. What are some characteristics of this collective ideological mindset of the Filipino?
1. Attitude towards Self. The Filipino sees himself as a “sinner” and an imperfect person. And because of he is taught to hate himself and the world, he is constantly battling his demons, constantly checking and always punishing himself. This kind of perpetual war inside of him saps him of his energies and creativity. It makes him a docile person. A country of docile persons will not move.
2. Attitude towards the World. The Filipino sees the world as “evil” and therefore, hopes to “save himself” by escaping from it. Furthermore, the Filipino sees the world as a “vast entity in which irresistible forces manifest themselves”. This attitude breeds a people with escapist mentality and a sense of powerlessness. They do not consider themselves as the masters of their destinies but as victims (which they celebrate also).
3. Concept of Salvation. One’s concept of salvation is important because such concept defines the raison d’etre of life. Building on the attitude of the Filipino that the world is evil, “salvation” for the Filipino consists of “saving oneself from the world” and to prepare for the “world to come”. Development requires a concept of salvation that seeks to transform this present, real world so that there can be justice, freedom and abundance.
4. Attitude towards Life. The Filipino sees life as something that happens to him (not something that he can make happen). He is resigned to his fate or to the fate that God deigns him to have. (Bahala na ang Diyos).
5. Attitude towards Riches. The Filipino believes in the so-called “preferential option for the poor.” This attitude of exalting the poor makes the poor justified in their poverty (makes them laggards) and condemns the rich as “sinners”. Thus, no development happens. The poor are morally content to remain poor as Christ was poor, and the rich, harboring guilt feelings because they are rich, sees no need to make himself further rich.
Those are some of the reasons why we continue to be poor. And it is all because of Catholicism.
Related posts:
10 Responses for "Why is RP Poor? Catholicism is the Reason"
I agree with #4. Instead of striving hard, a lot of Pinoys are contented to just exist…because “that was what God intended”. They believe in luck and wait for heavenly blessings instead of working smartly (vs. just plain brute-force working).
as for your other arguments, I don’t agree much with them. I don’t think the rich feel any guilt for being rich.
When it comes to the topic of religion, I think the problem lies with the docility that religion preaches. Pinoys are expected to just follow tradition without really understanding or thinking about why they should do those rituals. The same mentality then pervades to other aspects of life.
Hi Yuga,
You may probably blame some of the Pinoys’ ways but not Catholicism. I lived in prosperous European states and a lot if not most of the people there are Catholics. France, Italy, Germany, Switzerland… Even Britain’s Anglican Church is 95% catholic in terms of doctrine. I was even told that in places where they don’t have a presence, members of the Church of England (Anglicans) are allowed to hear the Catholic mass.
Lastly, I am not a Jesuit or Opus Dei defender of the faith. I also criticize priests and religious leaders. However, may I give this friendly reminder to be careful when it comes to criticizing entire religions. All great wars were started and waged in the name of God. Remember what Arafat said?
Oops, sorry! I thought it was Yuga who wrote the piece. I reached this site through his myblog account.. My comment was for Jerome Nadal
It’s not just with Catholicism. Other faith, like INC, have attitude towards riches (#5) but doesn’t exactly condemned rich as “sinners”.
I posted a rebuttal comment prior to Bryan’s reply. Please approve it. Thanks
Nadal’s analysis on the poorness of the Filipino people is not basically focusing on the lack of material wealth but on the “poorness of the soul.”
However,this will be met with a certain degree of skepticism by Catholic believers for the mere idea that religion is not an opium of the mind but the key to an enlightened soul.
I agree that the poorness of the soul starts with having the wrong values in life.This is one point of reference–THE NEED FOR INTERNAL CHANGE.
Positive internal change catapults an external transformation that will allow a more inspiring and a determined way of life which can contribute to productivity and a well-balanced life.
Like my personal philosophy in life,I make it a point to review my thoughts and actions at the end of the day before I blame external factors.
why catholic only?inc is the biggest corruptor of our government. imagine they can demand to post military men for their protection?what more they cant do?if you dont know they already took hold local level, bgy. that is.nakikisakay lang pero pinakamalawak ang sakop sa gobyerno natin. matakot……..!
If this is all gospel truth how do you explain why predominant Catholic countries like Chile, Uruguay, Spain, France and Portugal scored high and well in the UN Human Development Index as well as Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index.
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco_hum_dev_ind-economy-human-development-index
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index#CPI_Ranking_.282002.E2.80.932007.29
I am a Catholic. I also love my country. Like Jerome Nadal, I also wish to see progress in this country. Jerome and I appear to diverge on the following points:
1. The Filipino Catholic does not look himself as a “sinner” alone, but also as a child of God. Catholicism teaches that. The Filipino needs to claim it.
2. The Filipino Catholic sees the world as a paradise. The fruits are there. We just have to go out and pick them up. The Filipino just has to wake up earlier and work smarter, not harder. The Filipino is already a hard worker.
3. The Filipino Catholic sees salvation as living out the faith. Catholic life is a mix of faith and action. The Filipino just needs to believe more.
4. The Filipino Catholic sees life like this: Nasa Diyos ang Awa, Nasa Tao ang Gawa. The Filipino just needs to ask more, and do more.
5. The Filipino Catholic looks as being rich as an ideal, defined as being materially blessed AND being able to give. We don’t hate the rich, per se. In fact, we want to be like them, or at least the benevolent versions of those whom we don’t see as benevolent enough.
That’s my take on the arguments.
http://www.pinoytales.blogspot.com
I admit that my country is poor. But I don’t blame it to Catholicism. A person thinks and does things based on his own ideology- not necessarily based on what ideals Catholicism really has.
Leave a reply